Monday, June 28, 2010

The Current State of Affairs


"This momentous question, like a firebell in the night, awakened and filled me with terror. I considered it at once as the knell of the Union." When Thomas Jefferson wrote these words in 1820 after the passage of the Missouri Compromise, he was referring to the dispute over slavery that seemed to engulf the country at the time. Today, forces that threaten to endanger America's rank on the world stage still exist. For former NSF head Arden L. Bement, America's lack of progress in regards to advancement in science and technology jeopardizes enduring industries such as electrical power, recorded music, and motion pictures, industries that were once fledgling trades, sparked by Thomas Alva Edison's innovation. The 19th century gave birth to a plethora of new inventors-Cyrus McCormick, Samuel B. Morse, and Alexander Graham Bell constitute just a few. Edison was arguably the greatest of them all. By the time of his death at age 31, he had patented an astounding 1,093 mechanisms, "inventing the century," as Neil Baldwin described it. Edison and others like him helped establish America's scientific and technological dominance, a dominance that is no longer assured. Only about one-third of U.S. bachelor's degrees are in science or engineering now, compared with 63% in Japan and 53% in China. At his "invention factory" at Menlo Park, Edison established a goal to develop "a minor invention every ten days and a big thing every six months or so," a rate that even Steve Jobs would envy. Ironically, the industry that is most threatened today is one that Edison essentially created: energy. Clean power seems promising in its position to serve as the vangard of the 21st century much as aeronautics and the computer were to the 20th, but the U.S. is already lagging behind. China, South Korea, and Japan are positioned to invest more than $500 billion combined in clean technology over the next five years, while the U.S. is likely to invest less than $200 billion, on the assumption that clean-energy legislation actually makes it into law. Unless we invest in the education and research necessary to maintain the American edge, the U.S. will inevitably decline. The next generation of Edisons may be waiting, but unless we act quickly, they will not be equipped with the tools to thrive.

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Spirituality's mystery
Evadeth realms ethereal
Within a heart eternal
Lieth purest volatility

Resideth she in memory
Diaphanous, undefined
Flora, fauna tribute be
To power unparalleled

Sublime experience
Doth her bosom swathe
Wisdom, enlightenment
Of angles resemblant the
Bounty in which men bathe

Sunday, April 4, 2010

Born Again

John 3: 3 tells us that "no one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again." The meaning of what it means to be "born again" still remains unclear for Christians today. Early Christian martyrs who were in the face of persecution tended to conceive the resurrection as pertaining to the body, for this point of view proved meaningful for their circumstances. But does salvation actually comprise of new embodiment or does it constitute a kind of postmortem bliss, free from the constraints and limitations of the physical body? Ancient Jewish and Christian ideas concerning personal resurrection were surrounded by debate over the precise nature of the post-resurrection body. Some anticipated another flesh-and-bone body immune to physical decay and death while others presumed that God's followers would adopt bodies like those of angels. During the Roman period, many others viewed the human body as a prison from which the soul would finally be liberated at death and therefore looked upon bodily resurrection as a repugnant proposal. In Jesus' time, however, resurrection was not universally affirmed as some devout Jews, particularly the Sadducees, scoffed at the idea and considered it to be ludicrous. In Mark 12: 18-27, the Sadducees taunt Jesus with the question of whose wife a woman who has married seven times will be after the Resurrection. Jesus strongly affirms resurrection and portrays the Sadducees' question as a reflection of their ignorance of God's power. Regardless of the differences, and sometimes contradictions, among Christians' views of resurrection, Jesus was seen as the paradigm in all cases, and believers hoped for a similar fortunate fate to befall them.

The Meaning of Easter

Are Christians to carry out their faith solely through the convictions of their hearts, or is bodily implementation of that same creed necessary in addition to avoid the accusation, from either man or God, of apostasy or hypocrisy? Early Christians who believed in bodily resurrection identified with the latter view and deemed it crucial to live out their faith through their outward actions while retaining their inner beliefs. 1 Corinthians 6: 19-20 appears to support this notion, for the passage states, "Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your body." Elaine Pagels, a scholar of early Christianity, has argued that Christians who viewed the body as insignificant, perhaps the Gnostics, were more willing to make gestures of acquiescence to the Roman Empire as a result of their belief that only pure intentions of heart mattered to God. An argument may be made against this perspective if one considers the message of James 2: 26, which asserts, "As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead." This reference suggests the importance of practicing what one preaches. In addition, in the book of Revelation, the church in Laodicea is severely chastised for observing a watered-down, "inoffensive" form of Christianity, in which worldly and spiritual matters have become almost irrevocably amalgamated into a "lukewarm" dichotomy. In this letter, God strongly urges church members to abandon their tendency to straddle the fence and take a stand with regards to the revealing decision of whether they truly love Him.

Saturday, April 3, 2010

A Sunday Morning

Calm, serene, peaceful, tranquil, uneventful, desolate, deserted, empty, quiet, still, static, stagnant. Pathos pervades the atmosphere, the clock strikes noon, yet this bucolic side of town is not without vitality. A gentle breeze from the north carries the flowers from the Bradford pears like snowflakes to the deep green grass, occulted from the naked eye. Tulips line the edge of the center, circular garden bed, bright red and brilliant yellow. Leafcutter ants dot the sidewalk, inconspicuous in the breadth of the vast landscape. The streets are silent, taciturn, the homes uninhabited, abandoned, dead. The chipped paint and the straining planks a tribute to toil, the wandering words drifting through my mind one to tautology. Poignant, nostalgic, reminiscent memories float through time, space appears surreal, dimension retains no form or shape and begins to resemble a tesseract, tangible characteristics steadily disappear. Gravity capitulates, and for a few moments, the universe, still intact, lies prostrate, motionless, frozen. Introspection breeds doubt, questions, qualms, the use of singular indefinite nouns that have lost their amateur status to deduce broad, all-encompassing but often misleading, generalizations. Dreaming of another place, another time, counterfactual thinking overwhelming, curiosity overflowing, pressure suffocating. The eras begin to blur, all phenomenology and ontology a whirling, convoluted spiral, evocative of the Mandelbrot set, till time readopts its fleeting nature, the porch boards gradually reemerge, and the gentle back-and-forth motion of a rocking chair can once more be discerned.

Friday, April 2, 2010

Confidence

Confidence. She saunters through the halls at an andante pace like a gentle wind, soft but purposeful. She glides through the atmosphere with drops of Jupiter in her hair. Resolute and beautiful, determined and graceful, prepared and powerful. Unflappable in the face of adversity and precarious uncertainty, firm and secure in her faith. She knows where she stands, says, "I know exactly who I am." Though blessed with strong sense of self, pretentiousness evades her and humility, her longtime friend, accompanies her everywhere. Loving, compassionate, altruistic, a heart possessed by only a few, she gives generously, without discernment, discrimination, distinguishment of any kind. Made pure is her heart, soul, mind, body by the blood of another to whom she is eternally grateful and devotes all her strength. For this One does she live; for Him does she give. Freely and openly, liberally and wholly, absolutely and completely. Holiness flows from her bosom, envelopes her essence, her presence penetrating, overwhelming, pious. Lovely, surpasses a lady, more than wonderful because of He who is unfathomable, indescribable, uncontainable, untamable, all-powerful, incomparable, unchangeable, perfect. She strives to bring her Father glory and marvels at His magnificence. She prays His name not fall into desuetude for the fault of our churlish attitudes, lacking in servitude and gratitude. Lost feels she when unable to see His plans for all that is to come, occur, happen, take place, unfold before our very eyes. Reliance, trust, hope she places not in transient, fickle, capricious wants and desires, passion and fire, fen or mire, but in treasures stored in heaven, her heart, paradise, uncontingent on her part, Faithful and True, to obtain nothing can one do but believe in the Word, listen to the Voice of Truth, and serve.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Reflections on The Screwtape Letters by C. S. Lewis



·On page 70, Wormwood is told by Screwtape that his patient’s humility and self-hatred/self-denial “may even do us good if they keep the man concerned with himself, and, above all, if self-contempt can be made the starting-point for contempt of other selves, and thus for gloom, cynicism, and cruelty.” What does Screwtape mean and how is this the case?

On page 70, when Screwtape discusses the humility of Wormwood's patient, he is basically trying to get the patient to equate humility with low self-esteem and self-hatred. Screwtape advises Wormwood to distort his patient's view of humility to mean self-disparagement rather than considering others better than ourselves and looking not only to our own interests but also to the interests of others as Philippians 2 describes. If Wormwood’s patient adopts this ideal of humility, his cynical attitude will inevitably cause depression and trap him in a state of perpetual disconsolation. After identifying his own faults as a false fulfillment of humility, his patient will turn to the mistakes of others and judge other people harshly as well. As a result of focusing on negativity and all the wrongs of this world and innumerable faults of folks around him, he will fall into a deep hole of darkness and despair, which will gradually take on an aura of normality for him, dragging him deeper and deeper into the pits of Satan and farther away from God. Screwtape also wants the patient to see humility as belittlement of one’s achievements, which will “introduce an element of dishonesty and make-believe into the heart of what otherwise threatens to become a virtue.” If Wormwood’s patient does indeed start to believe that humility is simply a matter of self-disillusionment, he will not accept the virtue for what is actually is because of the false appearance of self-deceit he has assigned it. This mindset will draw the patient away from the Enemy because God’s virtues will no longer hold the quality of being pure, earnest, true qualities due to his misconstrued impressions.

· In what ways have you experienced in your own life the uneasiness and distraction which is described in this chapter?

I can relate to the discussion of distraction and uneasiness in chapter 12. Screwtape wants the patient to transform his uneasiness into distancing himself from God instead of seeking true repentance. Eventually, this desire to avoid God for fear of confrontation will lead to unproductivity, giving life a demeanor of nothingness and transforming purpose into meaninglessness like the book of Ecclesiastes. Over time, this feeling of lethargy will become harder to shake off the longer the nourishment of this feeling is prolonged. Oftentimes, when we’re really stressed or under a lot of pressure or just incredibly ill, this feeling of stagnancy can start to evolve into a disconcerting reality. I’m kind of experiencing this uneasiness right now because I’ve been sick for a few weeks and missed school today to go to the doctor, and sometimes the whole situation seems hopeless because I’m afraid of getting behind in school and wondering when I’ll get better and this illness will pass. I’m also concerned about my relationships with other people because I was supposed to make up a test after school today and since I was not able to, I’m fearful of the repercussions from my teachers. I think everything I’m dealing with is pretty minor but it seems to loom larger when you’re sick and weak. I don’t really like to dwell on personal struggles though because the world is a million times bigger than me, and I don’t want contemplation to ever turn into self-pity, which I absolutely despise. I think my problem is similar to Wormwood’s patient in that I need to learn to put my faith in God completely and trust him with all my heart as Peter did when he said, “The Lord will rescue me from every evil attack and will bring me safely to his heavenly kingdom,” as recounted in 2 Timothy 4:18. I need to have that same faith in God that he will help me through difficulties. Peter did not say that God “might” save him; he said God “will” save him, and that to me exemplifies ultimate trust in God’s word, which can serve as our defense against notions of nihility.
  • Why is a persistent focus on the FUTURE part of the Enemy's (Satan's) overall plan for our undoing? To what degree do you believe the culture of the United States to be focused or fixated on the FUTURE?
A persistent focus on the future is part of Satan’s overall plan for our undoing because constant focus on the future instills in us a fear of either hope or anxiety and can even fill us with dread if our expectations do not come to full fruition. Satan is pleased if one is calm and tranquil regarding prospects of the future due to a false sense of security, complacency, or too high a regard for his own abilities. Several sources of wisdom have warned us against this kind of nonchalant disposition. Phillips Brooks once said, “Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men!” When one, as described in the novel, prays for virtues wherewith to meet the difficulties and struggles in store for him and focuses on the present where all consciousness dwells, he is out of Satan’s grasp. We must also be wary to not adopt a sense of complacency about the future because of trust in our own abilities. Proverbs 3:5 reads, “Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding.” Leaning on our own understanding and justifying contentment about the future with this reasoning is dangerous, because as humans, we are fallible and can easily be lead astray if we do not look to the right sources for inspiration, which only God can provide indefinitely and unlimitedly. I think the culture of the United States is often too fixated on the future. We are consistently thinking about future plans, future goals and ambitions, future dreams, which is fine in moderation but we often muse over the future in excess. Oftentimes, we mull over the colleges we plan to attend, the work we have scheduled, or even the plans we have for next summer to a degree where our aspirations almost become imperious in their control over us. At the point where we are consumed by thoughts of the future, our thoughts take on the form of a stronghold and can actually separate us from God. Sometimes, we need to take things one step at a time and remember the prayer asking God to give us our daily bread.
  • On page 81, Screwtape tells Wormwood, "Surely you know that if a man can't be cured of churchgoing, the next best thing is to send him all over the neighbourhood looking for the church that 'suits' him." Why would Satan and his ambassadors want us to do this?
In Chapter 16, Screwtape advises Wormwood to instill in his patient a desire to go church hopping.  Satan and his ambassadors would likely want us to do this because this kind of desire arises from a mindset that implies self-superiority and nurtures the idea of a position of judgment rather than the role of a student and pupil who engages in worship with his fellow Christians. This reasoning reminds me of a chapel we once had where the speakers were stressing our collective role of worshipping God and fulfilling his service together. They reminded us that the people who speak and perform in chapel are not to be judged by us on their performance; that role is reserved for God alone, but rather we are ALL performing for God through listening attentively and receiving his word with open hearts. Satan desires to reverse this role and wants us to adopt an attitude of a critic rather than a pupil. Screwtape describes how God is the exact opposite and “wants of the layman in church an attitude which may be critical in the sense of rejecting what is false or unhelpful, but which is wholly uncritical in the sense that it does not appraise-does not waste time in thinking about what it rejects but lays itself open in uncommenting, humble receptivity to any nourishment that is going.” Satan would discourage adopting his kind of humble servitude, because in this condition, we are able to allow God’s Holy Spirit to engulf us and fill our lives, and Satan does not want us to be fulfilled. By allowing his patient to go church seeking, Wormwood’s patient would take on the false, misleading role of a teacher or rabbi and become blind to his true, actual role as God’s son.
  • In essence, Screwtape tells Wormwood that the whole principle by which Hell functions and operates is COMPETITION: "My good is my good and your good is yours. What one gains another loses." Do you think there is truth in this? Why or why not? Is it possible for life to operate by the "win/win" principle in which everyone wins and no one loses? How have you seen competition to be healthy? Unhealthy?
  • In his concluding remarks to Wormword in this letter, Screwtape says: “They [humans] regard the intention of loyalty to a partnership for mutual help, for the preservation of chastity, and for the transmission of life, as something lower than a storm of emotion.” In your own words, describe what Screwtape is saying here.
Ø  I don’t think Screwtape’s comment about the good of individuals being non-mutual is valid. The statement “my good is my good and your good is yours” completely contradicts the concept of community, which we rely upon and draw strength from, and for this reason cannot be true. This view is the polar opposite of that expressed in Countee Cullen’s poem “Any Human to Another” which states “your grief and mine must intertwine, like sea and river, be fused and mingle, diverse yet single, forever and forever.” Cullen presents her idea of community through the meaning of empathy, which is nonexistent in Satan’s world. Screwtape in his letter states that God aims to show how “things are to be many, yet somehow also one.” I think it is very possible, even essential, for life to operate by the “win/win” principle. Often collaboration and cooperation rather than competition offer the best solutions to everyday problems. By reaching a consensus, all people will benefit leading to further progress rather than the gain of some at the expense of others. Competition does have its arena, however, and can be healthy if serving as a source of motivation to be the best we can be. Competition has proved to be a good thing when it drives people to strive to produce the best results possible, but can be harmful when one fails to see the bigger picture and places the individual interests above those of the community. Competition becomes unhealthy when one decides to extract all possible benefits from a community without remembering to give back to it.

Ø  When Screwtape says that humans “regard the intention of loyalty to a partnership for mutual help, for the preservation of chastity, and for the transmission of life, as something lower than a storm of emotion,” he is referring to people’s tendency to place emotionalism on a higher shelf than commitment. Screwtape means that often we tend to yield to the unpredictable, randomly chaotic, inconsistent emotions that we experience as a result of change in circumstance rather than embracing a consistent attitude of temperance and patience. Because long-term commitment and loyalty sharply contrast with this often accepted indulgence in emotions rather than paradigms, Screwtape suggests that our view of marriage and fidelity is flawed in a way that benefits his corrupt intentions.